Saturday, November 30, 2019

This essay will discuss the history of science

This essay will discuss the history of science-fiction film Gorts dominance is connoted in this extract through SFX in two ways. Firstly, Gorts might is shown when he annihilates two soldiers and their weapons; they are brushed away as though they dont exist. Secondly, Gort burns a whole in a brick wall showing his strength against one of Earths strongest materials. Gorts power and the fear the audience should feel about it is further demonstrated by the dialogue and acting. For example, Helen screams hysterically when she is alone with Gort. This is the only time in the film that hysteria is shown in any way and this informs the audience to show a fearful response. We will write a custom essay on This will discuss the history of science-fiction film specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Gorts power over people is denoted in his height as he is much taller than any of the human characters, and therefore looks down on all humans. This is further emphasised by the camera positions that show Gort in relation to other characters. For example in the scene where Gort annihilates the two soldiers the camera is tilted over Gorts shoulder showing an aerial view of them coming towards him, this connotes that the soldiers are much smaller than Gort, and it also denotes how much power Gort has over the Earth. Vladimir Props theory can be seen clearly in this extract. He suggested that every film and book consists of eight character types, a villain, a hero, a donor, a helper, a princess, a father, a dispatcher, and a false hero. The hero isnt always good, he is just the character the plot is set around, the helper gives something of magical content to the hero, the father congratulates the hero, and the dispatcher sends the hero on their way. The villain in this film is not a character but the conflict the hero is trying to stop, i. e. the cold war. The hero is obviously Klaatu, the princess is Helen, and the donor is Gort as he restores Klaatu back to life. The helpers in this extract are Helen and the professor as they help Klaatu call the meeting together. The professor is also the father, and, finally the dispatchers are the other planets Klaatu mentions in his speech. In the extract of the film I am reading the audience do not see the false hero, however from the rest of the film we know him to be Tom as it is he who starts the doubt in everyones mind that Carpenter (Klaatu) is a bank robber. Levi-Strauss suggested that every film and story is centred on binary opposites, two things that are completely opposite to each other, for example the homesteaders and natives in Westerns. In this film, the binary opposites can be seen to be war and peace. Representation and symbolism are extremely important in this film. These techniques can be seen not only in the negative and radical representations of war, but also in the religious representations. There are many connections between Klaatu and Jesus, and Gort and God. Firstly, Klaatu refers to Jesus by adopting the symbolic name of Carpenter. Gort also brings Klaatu back to life in this extract, as God resurrected Jesus. Klaatu protects the world from Gorts power, in the New Testament Jesus comes to Earth not only to spread a message of peace but also to protect the world from Gods wrath. This technique gives the message that there are no good guys in war a heavier impact. As the film is trying to give an important plea for peace, there are no hysterics from the characters. However, there is tension in this extract and, at one point Helen screams when she is frightened by Gort, but she controls herself and manages to talk to Gort sensibly. .u285a0804d42252ee0f89bf46fae65400 , .u285a0804d42252ee0f89bf46fae65400 .postImageUrl , .u285a0804d42252ee0f89bf46fae65400 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u285a0804d42252ee0f89bf46fae65400 , .u285a0804d42252ee0f89bf46fae65400:hover , .u285a0804d42252ee0f89bf46fae65400:visited , .u285a0804d42252ee0f89bf46fae65400:active { border:0!important; } .u285a0804d42252ee0f89bf46fae65400 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u285a0804d42252ee0f89bf46fae65400 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u285a0804d42252ee0f89bf46fae65400:active , .u285a0804d42252ee0f89bf46fae65400:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u285a0804d42252ee0f89bf46fae65400 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u285a0804d42252ee0f89bf46fae65400 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u285a0804d42252ee0f89bf46fae65400 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u285a0804d42252ee0f89bf46fae65400 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u285a0804d42252ee0f89bf46fae65400:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u285a0804d42252ee0f89bf46fae65400 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u285a0804d42252ee0f89bf46fae65400 .u285a0804d42252ee0f89bf46fae65400-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u285a0804d42252ee0f89bf46fae65400:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Compare and Contrast Theater, Poetry and Fiction EssayThe rationality of the characters emphasises the importance of the films message. I like this film in that I feel it has universal meaning made by the message of peace and war and therefore will be respected for many years to come. I think the special effects are very good for the year this was made, especially the scene in the extract I studied, when Gort burns the brick wall down to save Klaatu. I feel tension is still created in the extract I studied, and the acting mainly does this. I found it interesting to see the film was used again to inspire many new films, and this built up my respect for the film as a piece o f Art. However, there are two things I found very poor, and would have probably put me off watching this film for leisure. Firstly, the language Klaatu and Helen use to speak to Gort is strange and slightly comic for 21st century viewers. Secondly, I found the non-diegetic sound dated and too mechanical. In conclusion, in The Day The Earth Stood Still, Robert Wise uses camera angles, sound, mise-en-scene, representation and narrative conventions to create a popular science-fiction movie that puts forward an anti-war message. The futuristic feeling of The Day The Earth Stood Still is mainly given by the non-diegetic sound, and the innovative look of the spaceship and the robot, i. e. the mise-en-scene. Religious symbolism and a rational tone of the dialogue are used to highlight the anti-war message. I need a conclusion need help with this! Is there any places I can cut? Need to change to Klaatu is there a quick way I can do this?

Tuesday, November 26, 2019

Reflection and Inspiration †Creative Writing

Reflection and Inspiration – Creative Writing Free Online Research Papers Reflection and Inspiration Creative Writing An unexamined life is not worth living.- Socrates. Consciously or unconsciously, I have followed this belief throughout my life because I derive the meaning to be essential to mature and to fully experience life. I believe maturity and growth are directly related to reflecting on and learning from past experiences. Life is like a game of chess; if you do not look back and see why you lost the game you will never develop into a better chess player from that loss. To grow as a person, I have to be honest with myself and to examine where I come from, where I am now, and where I want to go. It is also important to know my capabilities, my limitations, and have the wisdom to accept them. I like to understand my mistakes, have the courage to learn from them and then to continue forward. As I have grown through high school, I have realized that I have experienced a period of complacency. Looking back and reflecting on what I could have done, I realize that complacency in this stage of my life did not serve me well. I consider myself a rolling stone; someone who is always in process of change and growth and has yet to find a place settle, if settling is even possible along the way. As a master chess player having played nearly a thousand games in my lifetime, I keep thinking, considering, and analyzing. I do not become passive and, even when I do not win, I am urged to use the lesson to my next level of play. My desire to attend college is the flame that lights the way to down the tunnel and into the landscape of new adventures. I want to know more about myself and take risks when circumstances allow for this. When a situation presents itself, I become very analytical and thoughtful to find the necessary grain of possibility to further develop my personality. It is very much like the somewhat instinctive chess moves I make when I encounter a series of plays I have witnessed in the past. I sense a possibility out there which generates an ambitious force within me that sets my mind to focus on something I want and pushes me towards to attaining my goal. Thinking back at my last games of chess, I review each move that led to checkmate to smaller steps with my pawn along the way. Each is significant toward the end goal. Reflecting back through my life, I realize that each one made me who I am today. My quest to understand and grow from my experiences has made me who I am today. Philosophical inquiry and academic passion are the source of my drive and inspiration. Research Papers on Reflection and Inspiration - Creative WritingThe Hockey GameComparison: Letter from Birmingham and CritoStandardized TestingBook Review on The Autobiography of Malcolm XEffects of Television Violence on ChildrenRelationship between Media Coverage and Social andCapital PunishmentThe Effects of Illegal ImmigrationThree Concepts of PsychodynamicOpen Architechture a white paper

Friday, November 22, 2019

Pastoralism and the Development of Civilization

Pastoralism and the Development of Civilization Pastoralism refers to a stage in the development of civilization between hunting and agriculture and also to a way of life dependent on the herding of livestock, specifically, ungulates. The Steppes and the Near and Middle East are particularly associated with pastoralism, although mountainous regions and areas too cold for farming can also support pastoralism.  In the Steppes near Kiev, where the wild horse roamed, pastoralists used their knowledge of cattle herding to domesticate the horse. Lifestyle Pastoralists focus on raising livestock and tend to the care and use of animals such as camels, goats, cattle, yaks, llamas and sheep.  Animal species vary depending on where pastoralists live in the world; typically they are domesticated herbivores that eat plant foods. The two main lifestyles of pastoralism include nomadism and transhumance. The nomads practice a seasonal migratory pattern that changes annually, while transhumance pastoralists use a pattern to cool highland valleys in summer and warmer ones during the cold wintertime. Nomadism This form of subsistence agriculture, also known as farming to eat, is based on herding domesticated animals. Instead of depending on crops to survive, pastoral nomads primarily depend on animals that provide milk, clothing and tents.   Some key characteristics of pastoral nomads include: Pastoral nomads typically do not slaughter their animals but already dead ones may be used for food.Power and prestige are often symbolized by this cultures herd size.The type and number of animals are chosen in relation to local characteristics, such as climate and vegetation. Transhumance The movement of livestock for water and food encompasses transhumance. The core differentiator in regards to nomadism is that herders who are leading the flock must leave their family behind.  Their lifestyle is in harmony with nature, developing groups of people with the worlds ecosystem, embedding themselves in their environment and biodiversity. The main places you can find transhumance include Mediterranean locations such as Greece, Lebanon, and Turkey. Modern Pastoralism Today, most pastoralists live in Mongolia, parts of Central Asia and East African locations. Pastoral societies include groups of pastoralists who center their daily life around pastoralism through the tending of herds or flocks.  The benefits of pastoralism include flexibility, low costs and freedom of movement. Pastoralism has survived due to additional features including light regulatory environment and their work in regions that are not suited for agriculture. Quick Facts Over 22 million Africans depend on pastoralists for their livelihood today, in communities such as the Bedouins, Berbers, Somali and Turkana.There are over 300,000 cattle herders in Southern Kenya and 150,000 in Tanzania.Pastoralism societies can be drawn back to the time period 8500-6500 BC.Literary work involving shepherds and rustic life is known as pastoral which comes from the term pastor, Latin for a shepherd. SourceAndrew Sherratt Pastoralism The Oxford Companion to Archaeology. Brian M. Fagan, ed., Oxford University Press 1996. Oxford University Press.

Wednesday, November 20, 2019

Steps in Introducing a New Product in the Market Case Study

Steps in Introducing a New Product in the Market - Case Study Example This particular case was assigned to illustrate the notion that the success of a new product in the market mainly depends on the company’s ability to uphold customer demands as well as interests. In order to carry out successful research about product development, a four-step process can be adopted. The first step is idea generation which is followed by concept screening which is related to conducting surveys about the purchasing behaviour of the targeted people. The third step is related to product development and testing and this can be done through focus groups. The fourth stage is the quantification of the volume where the company estimates the likely sales volumes of the new product being introduced into the market. The other issue why the case study was assigned is related to the fact that the success of a new product in the market depends on measures that are put to satisfy unmet demand. The other issue is that a company should not be complacent after introducing a successful brand in the market. The company ought to be innovative so as to be in a position to keep pace with the constantly changing consumer trends. This helps the organization to stay ahead of the other rival competitors who may also offer the same products in this particular market. This entails that the company that has launched a new product should continue carrying out market research so as to be able to gather information about the interests of the consumers. The major challenge of launching a new product in a competitive market is that it may be difficult for the company to project realistic sales volumes that can sustain its operations. Over and above, it can be observed that a holistic approach should be taken when a company intends to launch a new product into the market. It is imperative for the organization to carry thorough market research so as to be in a position to satisfy the interests of the customers.

Tuesday, November 19, 2019

Healing in Marks Gospel Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Healing in Marks Gospel - Essay Example Further we will see that it is very arguable point. All cases of healing in Mark can be split into two broad categories: healing itself, and casting out demons and unclean spirits. The former one includes healing from fever, leprosy, paralysis, withered hand, haemorrhage, death, deafness, blindness, and in the latter one there are numerous instances of exorcism. When Jesus cast out an unclean spirit in Capernaum, it "convulsing him [a man] and crying with a loud voice, came out of him" (Mk 2:26). Whenever we read about demons and evil spirits we must remember that it's a common reference for mentally sick people of ancient and medieval times. Possessed ones actually had hysteria or various kinds of mental disorders (Crombie, 1964); belief in somebody's divinity could be a shock strong enough to cure themselves. It is important to note that at least in some cases (or even maybe in every one) it was a sick person healing himself, and Jesus was simply an agent, a catalyst. Crowds gathered around Jesus, for they believed that even a touch of his clothes could remove disease (Mark 5:28). A woman suffering from haemorrhage was healed, or maybe we should say "self-healed" in this way - in Mark 5:24-34 it is clearly shown. The woman thought that she would be healed if had touched Jesus' clothes, she believed in it. Notice that the meaning of "belief" has at least two different meanings: you can believe that Earth is round (in fact, it's a flattened sphere) but it doesn't affect your feelings, since you're not an ancient astronomer questioning the contrary. And there is belief that is somehow connected with your welfare, health or even life. Sometimes it grows up to the stage of temporary insanity, and a stress situation can have a great impact on individual. In our case we see the latter situation: "your faith has made you well" (Mark 5:34). Then the author adds: "go in peace, and be healed of your disease" to emphasise the role of Jesus. If we agree to the aforesaid, we must agree that disbelief works in adverse way. When Jesus returned to his hometown, there was no sensation, for they remember him to be just a son of carpenter. Men in synagogue demonstrated hostility against him and "he could do no deed of power there" (Mark 6:5), though healed a few people. About the same way Jesus healed Simon's mother-in-law, who had fever (Mark 1:29); a paralysed man (Mark 2); a man with a withered hand (Mark 3:5); a deaf man near Decapolis (Mark 7:31-35); a blind man in Bethsaida (Mark 8:22-26) and near Jericho (Mark 10:46-52) and a multitude of people whose diseases are not mentioned. Actually, it doesn't matter what disease was healed; it matters, how it was healed. Sanders in his book "The Historical Figure of Jesus" (Sanders, 1996, especially chapter 17) goes further and also asks about perception specifics of ancient men, what they thought they saw and what really happened. Why the blind man in Bethsaida wasn't healed from the first attempt There may be many suggestions, but I think it's because of author's attitude towards prayers. Compare the case of epileptic boy, when Jesus' disciples were unable to heal him; there Jesus emphasised the importance of prayer and faith. We don't have to pay attention on imaginary

Saturday, November 16, 2019

Video games Essay Example for Free

Video games Essay â€Å"What Video Games Have to teach us about Learning and Literacy† I’m sure that we all are, or were at one time, around video games whether we were playing the game or someone we know was playing. Most adults think children spend too much time playing video games. I know my mom is constantly yelling at my 10 15-year-old brothers to get off. My mom thinks that video games for so long will eventually ruin their eyesight. My brothers are video game addicts. My brothers always complain when my mom tells them to get off. Maybe my mom is wrong about video games. Maybe they could actually help my brothers. James Gee has a different thought than my mom and most parents. James Gee is also a father of his 11-year-old son, which made Gee â€Å"immigrate† to the world of video games. James would sit there with his son and play with him, until one day he decided that he would play on his own. After playing by him, James realized that there is a lot more to video games and they can actually in a way be positive. James sees video games as a way for children to use their brains. You have to learn how to play the game before you play it or else you will not be able to move forward in the game. Most games have a goal that you have to learn how to get there. By the children learning how to play, it is positive and in scary way actually benefits the children even though parents would never think it. Gee and Prensky’s views are similar. In Prensky’s essay he says that he thinks it would be the right time for us to advance our educational system because as we can see, technology is now a big part of our generation and it is only going to grow. Prensky referred to the students of the world today as â€Å"digital natives† because we grew up with digital technology. Growing up into the world of technology made us adjust and get used to using it so quickly. The teachers don’t know as much as the â€Å"digital natives† (students) do about new technology. In my opinion, I think technology is a great thing in the world today. As a student in college, technology plays a huge part. I use my computer for 99% of my schoolwork. I use it in class, to take notes, for homework, for research, to print, etc. I’m sure I am not the only one that doesn’t like to read, so instead of us students using the library to use books for research, we can do it on our computers. I personally do not play video games and cannot see myself sitting there like my brothers for countless hours learning how to play. I definitely do agree with Gee, and can see video games benefiting people of all ages.

Thursday, November 14, 2019

free speech -- essays research papers

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION--SPEECH AND PRESS Adoption and the Common Law Background Madison's version of the speech and press clauses, introduced in the House of Representatives on June 8, 1789, provided: ''The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments; and the freedom of the press, as one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable.''1 The special committee rewrote the language to some extent, adding other provisions from Madison's draft, to make it read: ''The freedom of speech and of the press, and the right of the people peaceably to assemble and consult for their common good, and to apply to the Government for redress of grievances, shall not be infringed.''2 In this form it went to the Senate, which rewrote it to read: ''That Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and consult for their common good, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.''3 Subsequently, the religion clauses and th ese clauses were combined by the Senate.4 The final language was agreed upon in conference. Debate in the House is unenlightening with regard to the meaning the Members ascribed to the speech and press clause and there is no record of debate in the Senate.5 In the course of debate, Madison warned against the dangers which would arise ''from discussing and proposing abstract propositions, of which the judgment may not be convinced. I venture to say, that if we confine ourselves to an enumeration of simple, acknowledged principles, the ratification will meet with but little difficulty.''6 That the ''simple, acknowledged principles'' embodied in the First Amendment have occasioned controversy without end both in the courts and out should alert one to the difficulties latent in such spare language. Insofar as there is likely to have been a consensus, it was no doubt the common law view as expressed by Blackstone. ''The liberty of the press is indeed essential to the nature of a free state; but this consists in laying no previous restraints upon publications, and not in freedom from censure for criminal matter when published. Every freeman has an undoubted right to lay what sentiments he pleases before the public; to forbid this, is to destroy the freedom of the press: but if he publishes what is im... ... of the First Amendment preclude the notion that its purpose was to give unqualified immunity to every expression that touched on matters within the range of political interest. . . . 'The law is perfectly well settled,' this Court said over fifty years ago, 'that the first ten amendments to the Constitution, commonly known as the Bill of Rights, were not intended to lay down any novel principles of government, but simply to embody certain guaranties and immunities which we had inherited from our English ancestors, and which had from time immemorial been subject to certain well-recognized exceptions arising from the necessities of the case. In incorporating these principles into the fundamental law there was no intention of disregarding the exceptions, which continued to be recognized as if they had been formally expressed.' That this represents the authentic view of the Bill of Rights and the spirit in which it must be construed has been recognized again and again in cases that have come here within the last fifty years.'' Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494, 521-522, 524 (1951) (concurring opinion). The internal quotation is from Robertson v. Baldwin, 165 U.S. 275, 281 (1897).